US Democrats on Friday rolled out their measure aimed at blocking President Donald Trump from circumventing Congress to seize federal dollars for construction of his controversial southern border wall.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the chamber would vote next Tuesday on the so-called disapproval resolution aimed at terminating the national emergency that Trump declared last week, an extraordinary step that sparked fierce political and legal battles.
The legislation is expected to clear the Democrat-held House of Representatives, then head to the Senate where it is guaranteed a vote under the rules. Its fate is anything but assured in the upper chamber, which is controlled by Trump’s Republicans, however.
“There is no evidence to support the president’s false claim of a crisis on the border,” Pelosi told a conference call Friday from Laredo, Texas, where she and fellow lawmakers were preparing to visit a bridge connecting the US and Mexico.
Read More: 16 US states sue Trump over border wall emergency
Trump announced the emergency last week to bypass Congress, which did not approve the $5.7 billion he wanted for his wall, a longstanding promise from his 2016 presidential campaign.
The spending bill, which he reluctantly signed to avert a government shutdown, included appropriations of just $1.4 billion for fencing and other barriers along the border, but specifically not for Trump’s proposed wall.
Democrats – and some wary Republicans – condemned Trump’s unilateral move as an effort to usurp the powers of the purse, which under the US Constitution are reserved for Congress.
“We do not have a monarch, we have a separation of powers in our country,” Pelosi said, adding she was urging Republicans to join Democrats in pushing back against the president.
The call to action comes as Trump and the White House press on with plans to repurpose some $6.6 billion from other sources, mostly already-allocated funds in the Defense Department budget.
Trump has repeatedly declared that rampant illegal immigration is fueling a crisis along the border, leading to higher crime and strains on public services such as health care.
‘Power grab’
Congressman Joaquin Castro cited low levels of illegal immigration and a record amount of national security resources at the border to boost the argument that Trump’s emergency declaration was unnecessary, and “an unconstitutional power grab.”
Castro said his resolution already has at least 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican – beyond the simple majority needed in the 435-member body.
He said he would keep calling Republicans to build support for the measure and to urge lawmakers to send a bipartisan message to Trump.
Read More: New York to challenge Trump ‘national emergency’ for wall
“If the Congress rolls over on this, the president is likely to do it again,” warned Castro, who chairs the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
Days earlier, 16 states filed suit against the Trump administration, saying the emergency declaration violated the US Constitution’s assertion that Congress is the final arbiter of public funds.
The White House has remained consistent in its position that the emergency order empowers Trump to reallocate funds.
But the lawsuit countered that tapping military money would result in enormous losses for the states’ National Guard units which would otherwise use the dollars for counter-drug activities and law enforcement.
Pelosi noted that a genuine emergency would secure support from Congress and the American people, but that Trump was merely declaring one in order “to honour an applause line in a rally.”